Towards an Extra-Linguistic Critique of J.L. Austin’s Speech Act Theory
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
What is Contract Law “About”? Speech Act Theory and a Critique of “Skeletal Promises”
What is contract law “about”? One way of looking at it is to conceive of the subjectmatter of contract law in terms of promises – somewhat like tort law revolves around the concepts of accident or harm. Much like accidents -first-year law students are taught -promises are “out there” in the world, to be classified and distinguished so as to privilege some with legal enforceability. There is a l...
متن کاملTowards a Contrastive Pragmatic Analysis of Congratulation Speech Act in Persian and English
This paper aims at studying the speech act of congratulation in Persian and English with regard to semantic formulas. To gather the semantic formulas related to congratulation, the researchers chose 100 movies (50 in Persian and 50 in English) as the instrument of the study. The only model of cross-cultural comparison was related to that of Elwood (2004). Therefore, we used Elwood’s model as th...
متن کاملTowards Linguistic Naturalness of Synthetic Speech
This paper presents another step towards linguistic naturalness of synthetic Czech. The main goal of this study is to avoid unintended occurrences of parasitic speech sounds (namely preglottalization) in synthesised speech. Firstly, we explain what we mean by the term parasitic speech sound. Secondly, procedures for both automatic detection and segmentation of these sounds in source speech reco...
متن کاملthe analysis of the role of the speech acts theory in translating and dubbing hollywood films
از محوری ترین اثراتی که یک فیلم سینمایی ایجاد می کند دیالوگ هایی است که هنرپیش گان فیلم میگویند. به زعم یک فیلم ساز, یک شیوه متأثر نمودن مخاطب از اثر منظوره نیروی گفتارهای گوینده, مثل نیروی عاطفی, ترس آور, غم انگیز, هیجان انگیز و غیره, است. این مطالعه به بررسی این مسأله مبادرت کرده است که آیا نیروی فراگفتاری هنرپیش گان به مثابه ی اعمال گفتاری در پنج فیلم هالیوودی در نسخه های دوبله شده باز تولید...
15 صفحه اولin Foundations of Speech Act Theory
Like Humpty Dumpty, many philosophers take pride in saying what they mean and meaning what they say. Literalism does have its virtues, like when you're drawing up a contract or programming a computer, but generally we prefer to speak loosely and leave a lot to inference. Language works far more efficiently that way. Two Kinds of Looseness It helps if you can rely on people not to take you too l...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature
سال: 2013
ISSN: 2200-3592,2200-3452
DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.5p.241